CrystalDiskMark vs AS SSD Benchmark: Which Speed Test is Better? (2026 Guide)
CrystalDiskMark vs AS SSD Benchmark: We compare the two most popular free SSD testing tools. Learn the difference between compressible data, copy tests, and which benchmark you should trust.
Introduction
If you want to know exactly how fast your new Solid State Drive (SSD) is, you will inevitably run into two legendary pieces of freeware: CrystalDiskMark and AS SSD Benchmark.
On the surface, they look incredibly similar. They both feature a simple grid interface, they both test Sequential and Random read/write speeds, and they both output results in Megabytes per second (MB/s).
However, beneath the surface, these two programs test your hardware in entirely different ways. Depending on the type of SSD controller you have, one program might show a blazing-fast score of 7,000 MB/s, while the other shows a much slower 5,000 MB/s on the exact same drive!
In this comprehensive guide, we will break down the exact differences in the CrystalDiskMark vs AS SSD Benchmark showdown, explain why their scores differ, and help you decide which tool to trust.
CrystalDiskMark: The Industry Standard
Developed in Japan by Crystal Dew World, CrystalDiskMark (CDM) is the most widely recognized storage benchmark on the internet. Whenever a manufacturer like Samsung or Western Digital advertises the “up to” speeds on their SSD boxes, they are almost always quoting a CrystalDiskMark result.
How it Works: CrystalDiskMark tests your drive’s peak, absolute maximum performance capabilities. It highly stresses the drive by simulating different “Queue Depths” (how many data requests are waiting in line) and “Threads” (how many software processes are asking for data at once).
The Pros:
-
Highly Customizable: You can adjust the test file size (from 16MB to 64GB), the queue depth, and the thread count to perfectly simulate your specific workload.
-
Peak Performance: It shows you the absolute maximum speed your drive is capable of achieving under ideal conditions.
-
Modern NVMe Profile: The newest versions include a specific “NVMe SSD” profile designed to push PCIe Gen 4 and Gen 5 drives to their absolute limits.
The Cons:
-
Unrealistic Expectations: Because it tests for absolute peak performance, the speeds you see in CrystalDiskMark are rarely the speeds you will experience in normal, daily Windows usage.
AS SSD Benchmark: The Worst-Case Scenario Tester
Developed in Germany, AS SSD Benchmark was created specifically to expose the weaknesses in early SSD controllers (specifically SandForce controllers, which used data compression to cheat speed tests).
How it Works:
Unlike other testers, AS SSD uses 100% incompressible data (completely randomized zeros and ones). It forces the SSD controller to work as hard as physically possible without using any software shortcuts or caching tricks.
The Pros:
-
The “Copy Benchmark”: This is AS SSD’s secret weapon. Instead of just showing raw MB/s, it includes a real-world copy test. It simulates exactly how long it will take (in seconds) to copy an ISO file, load a heavy software Program, or launch a Game.
-
The Overall Score: At the end of the test, AS SSD gives you a single, unified “Score” (e.g., 5,200). This makes it incredibly easy to compare two completely different drives without having to analyze eight different data points.
-
Shows True Minimum Speeds: Because it uses incompressible data, AS SSD shows you the “worst-case scenario” for your drive.
The Cons:
-
Lower Scores: Your speeds will almost always look slower in AS SSD compared to CrystalDiskMark. This can confuse users into thinking their drive is broken.
-
Outdated UI: The software has not been updated as frequently as CrystalDiskMark, and the interface feels quite old.
The Core Difference: Compressible vs Incompressible Data
If you run both tests back-to-back, you will notice something strange: CrystalDiskMark will usually give you a higher score. Why?
It comes down to how the data is generated.
-
Some SSD controllers use a trick where they instantly compress data on the fly to write it faster.
-
By default, CrystalDiskMark generates data that is fairly easy for the SSD to compress, allowing the drive to hit its absolute maximum advertised speeds.
-
AS SSD Benchmark intentionally generates data that is mathematically impossible to compress. This forces the SSD to write the full weight of the file, completely bypassing the controller’s speed tricks.
Think of CrystalDiskMark as testing a car’s top speed on a perfectly smooth racetrack, while AS SSD Benchmark tests that same car’s speed while driving up a steep, muddy hill.
Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | CrystalDiskMark | AS SSD Benchmark |
| Data Type Used | Default (Customizable) | 100% Incompressible |
| Real-World “Copy” Test | No | Yes (ISO, Program, Game) |
| Overall Final Score | No | Yes |
| Customizable Queue Depths | Yes (Highly advanced) | Limited |
| Best For | Finding absolute peak speeds | Finding worst-case scenario speeds |
Conclusion: Which One Should You Use?
At the end of the day, both tools are completely free, lightweight, and safe to use. You do not have to pick just one!
-
Use CrystalDiskMark when you install a brand-new drive and want to verify that it hits the speeds printed on the manufacturer’s box. It is the gold standard for verifying that your hardware is working correctly.
-
Use AS SSD Benchmark when you want to know exactly how your drive will perform under the heaviest, most unoptimized workloads, or if you want a simple “Overall Score” to compare against your friend’s PC.
